This is an example of an agent you can build with Sylvie: point it at a brand, a product line or a single page and it returns the keyword set already grouped into clusters, tagged by intent and matched to the page that should own each term. It runs on your brand brain, so it starts from your real products, the language your buyers use in calls and reviews, and everything you have already published, instead of a generic export off one seed word. Sylvie does not ship it finished; your team builds it and encodes your own research method into it.
Sylvie does not ship this agent pre-built. It is an example of an agent your team can build with Sylvie, powered by your brand brain, so it runs your workflow the way you actually run it.
The Keywords agent is an example of what a marketing or SEO team can build on Sylvie: research that comes back as a decision rather than four thousand rows for someone to sort on a Friday afternoon. It clusters terms by intent, marks which stage of the funnel each cluster serves, and says plainly which existing page should own it or what still needs to be written.
For agencies, keyword research is the first deliverable of a new engagement and one of the things clients judge you on hardest. Built from a seed word and a tool export, it looks identical for every client on your roster. Built on a brand brain, it reflects that brand's actual catalog, its positioning, the terms it has the authority to win and the words its customers really use, so the plan survives the kickoff call.
The agent starts inside the brand brain: the product and service catalog, the categories the brand wants to be known for, the positioning and claims it can stand behind, the voice-of-customer language sitting in sales calls, reviews and support threads, plus every page you have already published so it knows what you rank for and where you would end up competing with yourself. Because the brain is permission-aware, research for one client never draws on another's.
Then it runs the research workflow end to end in Sylvie: it expands your seeds into a full term set, groups them into clusters with a primary term and its variants, tags intent and funnel stage, checks each cluster against your live pages, and returns a map of what to keep, what to consolidate and what to write, with the reasoning attached. Approve a cluster and it stays in the brain, so the briefs and drafts that follow all start from the same plan.
The agent weighs relevance to what the brand genuinely sells and the authority it has to talk about it, so the set is not padded with high-volume terms you have no business chasing.
You get grouped topics with a primary term, its variants and the intent behind each one, ready to become briefs, instead of a spreadsheet waiting for a strategist with a free week.
Because the brain holds sales calls, reviews and support threads, the set includes the phrases buyers actually type, not only the ones a keyword tool suggests.
Every cluster is checked against the pages you already have, so you consolidate or reassign rather than publishing a fourth post that quietly outranks your own best result.
Work that fills a strategist's week for a new client comes back the same day, so a proposal, an audit or a quarterly plan stops waiting on research to catch up.
The agent applies your methodology identically across every brand you run, so a junior delivers senior-standard research and clients get consistent thinking whoever is staffed on them.
Here is where teams point this agent once they have built it on a brand brain. Each of these is work that would otherwise mean a strategist, a tool export and a long weekend of sorting rows.
You have won the account and kickoff is in five days. The agent builds the clustered keyword map from that client's brand brain, products, positioning and existing pages included, so you walk into kickoff with a prioritized plan instead of a promise and the first briefs go out the same week.
Next quarter's calendar is a list of vague themes and a few opinions. The agent turns them into clusters with a primary term, an intent and the page that should own each one, so twelve weeks of content get planned in a morning and every piece has a reason to exist.
Three of your posts compete for the same term and none of them ranks. The agent maps the overlap against your published pages and recommends what to merge, redirect or repoint, so a fix everyone kept postponing takes an afternoon and the surviving page climbs.
A client is launching a category they have never sold before and the internal naming is nothing like the market's. The agent builds the term set from the product facts in the brain plus the language buyers use for that category, so launch pages target demand that already exists instead of vocabulary invented in a product meeting.
You are pitching a prospect and want to show the gap rather than describe it. The agent maps the category's terms against what the prospect's site currently covers, so the deck carries a real opportunity map built in an hour and the pitch stops sounding like every other agency's audit slide.
A brand is opening in three countries and each needs native terms, not translated ones. The agent builds a set per market against the positioning in the brand brain, so a rollout that used to need a local agency per country gets scoped in-house in a few days.
No, it replaces the sorting. Tools give you volume, difficulty and a very long export; this agent, built on your brand brain, decides which of those terms fit what the brand sells, groups them into clusters and says which page should own each one. You can feed it your existing exports and it works through them with the brand's context attached.
You build it. Sylvie does not sell a finished Keywords agent; this page is an example of what a team assembles on the platform. Sylvie helps you connect it to your brand brain and encode your own research method, so the output reads like your agency's work rather than a vendor's template.
Context no tool can see: what the brand actually sells, what it is allowed to claim, how buyers phrase the problem in calls and reviews, which pages already exist and which terms you already own. That context is the difference between a list of keywords and a plan someone can act on.
Yes. Each brand has its own brain, isolated and permission-aware, so research for one client never draws on or leaks into another's. You get one consistent method across the whole roster while the substance stays specific to each brand.
That is the point of building the agent instead of renting one. You set how it scores opportunity, which intents matter to you, how tight a cluster should be, what it does with branded and competitor terms, and what it hands off downstream. Two agencies building a keywords agent on Sylvie end up with two genuinely different agents.
It stays in the brand brain, so the clusters you approve become the reference that briefs, writers and other agents work from, and next quarter's research starts from decisions you already made. Nothing gets stranded in a spreadsheet on one person's drive.
Book a demo and we will map the workflows worth turning into agents, and show how each one runs on your brand brain.
Request a demo