This is an example of an agent you can build with Sylvie: a tireless reviewer that checks every deliverable (ads, emails, landing pages, social, decks) against the brand's guidelines and the client's approved rules before it goes out. It reads directly from your Brand Brain, so it already knows the locked palette, the tone of voice, the claims legal signed off on, and the direction the client rejected last quarter. Sylvie assembles it on top of the brain you already have, and it flags the exact line, cites the rule, and suggests the on-brand fix.
Sylvie does not ship this agent pre-built. It is an example of an agent your team can build with Sylvie, powered by your brand brain, so it runs your workflow the way you actually run it.
Brand QA & Compliance is an example of an agent you assemble inside Sylvie, not a product we ship pre-built. It is a reviewer that reads every asset before it ships and checks it against two things: your brand standards (palette, logo, typography, tone, approved messaging) and the compliance rules that apply (required disclosures, claim restrictions, trademark usage, region-specific language).
For a marketing team or agency, brand consistency is where quality quietly leaks. Freelancers, new hires, three channels and four regions each drift a little, and the person who used to catch it simply can't review everything by hand. An agent built on your brand brain reviews all of it, every time, and holds the standard identical whether it's asset number 3 or number 300.
The agent reads your Brand Brain first. Every locked rule, approved claim, tone note and past rejection lives there, traced back to the Slack thread, brief or approval it came from, so the agent checks against what the client and legal actually signed off on, not a stale PDF nobody remembered to update.
Then it runs the review inside Sylvie and finishes the job there. It scores the asset, flags the exact line that breaks a rule, cites the source of that rule, and suggests an on-brand fix, then logs the whole pass so anyone can answer 'why was this flagged'. Nothing is handed off to another tool, and every decision stays auditable, isolated per brand.
Your senior people stop line-checking every asset by hand. The agent reviews the whole queue and hands back only what breaks a rule, turning QA from reading everything into approving exceptions.
Palette, tone, logo and approved messaging stay identical across freelancers, regions and channels, because every asset checks against the same brand brain instead of someone's memory of the guidelines.
Off-brand and non-compliant work is caught before the client or legal ever sees it, so drafts come back clean instead of bouncing through three rounds of changes.
One agent QAs two hundred deliverables a week without adding a reviewer. You can take on more clients and more volume without growing the team just to police the work.
Every past rejection and locked rule stays in the brain. The mistake a client called out in March doesn't quietly reappear in September, even after the people who remember it have moved on.
Required disclosures, claim limits and trademark rules get checked on every asset, and each pass is logged with citations. Nothing risky ships, and you can show a client exactly why it was cleared.
A few of the reviews teams set this agent to run. Each one is assembled on your brand brain and tuned to the standards you actually enforce.
Before a batch of 40 Meta and TikTok variants goes to the client, the agent checks every one against the locked palette, approved hooks and the claims legal cleared. What used to be a half-day of manual eyeballing comes back in minutes with six flagged variants, so the batch ships the same day instead of waiting for the next review slot.
For a creator campaign, the agent scans every caption and script for the required disclosure, banned claim language and off-limits competitor mentions before anything posts. The team clears 30 pieces of creator content in one pass instead of chasing each influencer's edits, and no undisclosed post slips through to become a compliance problem.
A freelancer who has never touched the account submits their first landing page and email. The agent catches the wrong logo lockup, an unapproved tagline and a tone that runs too casual, with the exact brand rule cited on each. Onboarding that used to cost a senior designer two review rounds is done in one, and the freelancer learns the standard from the flags.
For a client in a regulated category, the agent checks every asset against the disclaimers, claim restrictions and market rules that apply before it leaves the building. Legal reviews a clean, pre-checked file instead of red-lining from scratch, turning a multi-day legal loop into a single sign-off and keeping a risky claim from ever reaching air.
The same campaign ships in four markets, each with its own approved translation, legal language and cultural do-not-use list. The agent QAs all four versions against each market's rules in one run, so a rollout that used to need a reviewer per region ships on time without any extra hires.
Before a strategy deck or client pitch leaves the agency, the agent checks it against the current brand template, approved stats and messaging so no stale number or off-brand slide sneaks in. A partner signs off on a deck they trust in minutes instead of proofing 60 slides the night before, and the agency's work looks consistent every time it's in front of a client.
A generic tool checks against generic rules and forgets your account the moment the chat closes. This agent is built on your Brand Brain, so it checks against your locked palette, your client's approved claims and the exact direction they rejected last quarter, and it cites the rule behind every flag. It gets your standards right because it runs on your context, not a blank model.
You don't code anything, and Sylvie doesn't ship it pre-built either. You assemble the agent inside Sylvie on top of the brand brain you already have, point it at the standards you want enforced, and it's reviewing real work in days. This page is an example of what a team builds, not a fixed product you switch on.
It doesn't guess. Every rule it enforces traces back to a real source in your brain (a brief, an approval, a locked decision), and newer decisions override older ones, so it never flags against a guideline that's already been replaced. If the client changed the palette last week, the agent already knows.
It reads the brain before every review: the guidelines, tone of voice, approved messaging, disclosure requirements and past rejections that live there. Because that memory keeps itself current from the tools your team already uses, the agent is always checking against the latest approved version, not last month's PDF.
Yes. You decide which standards it enforces, how hard it flags them, which categories need which disclosures, and what it suggests as a fix. Different clients get different rules because each brand has its own brain, so an agency can run one QA agent per account without the rules bleeding across.
Each brand's brain is fully isolated from every other account, encrypted in transit and at rest, and never used to train foundation models or sold. The agent only reads what its brand brain is permitted to see, and every review it runs is logged and auditable, so you can show a client exactly what was checked and why.
Book a demo and we will map the workflows worth turning into agents, and show how each one runs on your brand brain.
Request a demo